Ref: VKU-0001-dd10/02/2009 P O BOX 224
Enq: O J THEBE ITSOSENG
Tel: 0721991082 2010/05/31
OFFICE OF THE HEAD
IMPERIA HOLDINGS
REQUEST FOR A THOROUGH ENQUIRY INTO A CONTRADICTION
BETWEEN YOUR VEHICLE PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER –VKU-0001
TO DADA MOTORS LICHTENBURG MULTIFRANCHISE:
1 I hereby refer to the above subject matter.
A. Attached herewith find a copy of order number VKU- 0001 dated 10/02/2009 as referred to in the subject matter.
B. Also attached find a hand written break down of the R17, 940.00 instructed by Babu Dada to pay before the release of the vehicle to Mrs. M.D. THEBE.
C. Further find an acknowledgement signed unwisely by myself and my wife before the vehicle could be released to us, failing which the vehicle would not be released.
2. Sir, the order referred to in 1b is silent about the amounts stated in the hand written breakdown except of the R4, 850.00 referred to as excess amount, but I fail to understand why should I pay to the dealer a UNITY COMMISSION AMOUNTING TO R5, 090.00. An amount the above order is silent about.
3. A. Paragraph 4 of the said order, indicates that you invoiced the dealer, not me, for a 2% rebate amounting to R5, 090.00. Which I suspect the dealer is recovering from me by referring to it as a UNITY COMMISSION AS THE AMOUNTS ARE THE SAME.
B. The ORDER is very clear in paragraphs 3 and 4 about WHO must pay how much and why.
C. Until November the 4th 2009, we had not made a single payment into N M DADA account due to the dispute over the COMMISSION AND SHORTFALL matter. We only started paying under duress on the 4th of November 2009 when the dispute was heating up as the dealer was threatening with litigation. See attached confirmations of payments.
4. Please be informed that the commission matter has already been reported to UNITY INSURANSE and it is receiving attention. CORNETTE at unity has the details.
5. Regarding shortfall matter the vehicle had already travelled a lot. I raised that to the dealer and he said it was due to registration process.
A 2008 model released as a 2009 model just because registered in 2009.
Until date of accident the written off vehicle had not been fitted with extras as required.