I have been refusing to take notice of or acknowledge of gross harassment issues as asked by courtesy deployment and landlord from what I believe to be dilettantish tenement women. However neither are playing to be ignored. The occurrences are causing or leaves the impression, the skill was instructed or acquired by such means over a period of time.

Police won't even encroach their unit doors per perusal of complainant instruction.

Isn’t the act of using somebody or something for an unjust or cruel purpose, exploitation when police refuse to do that one thing? When a man is harassed by a woman, or the antithetical, his operate state or condition is that of a lacking strength, guarded as disadvantaged.

Both police deployed and the woman established are making full use of and deriving benefit from the situation as I am being subjugated in harassment cases. It’s unlawfully unfair and selfish. In my purview, it the women’s shenanigans are eventful and are expressing contempt or derision at any personification of justice. I always thought the blindfolded woman holding scales and a sword said it best. I am only asking police come and acquaint themselves with the repulsively ugly distorted dupery from both the woman in, 6404 Greig Street and the Pleasant Homes Apartment, site landlord.

She requests repeatedly that the police be deployed to the matter, however deems it harass if she is antithetically bothered again by the matter. Please (see)paragraph -7 appending hereto.
No actually threaten or enmeshed intimidations either, she just didn't want to address the two combatants and still didn't beneath the signed agreement.