Ruth Michele Epperson
714 Atwood Road
Philadelphia, PA 19151
[email protected]
(215) 477 - 3341
EMC Account #: 1651991
ATTN: Predatory Mortgage Actions
To Whom it may concern;
Due to an EMC Mortgage Company clerical mistake, I’ve had to go to court every month from August 2009 thru February 2010, to stop them from selling my house via Sheriff Sale.
This started in May 2009. I sent in my normal payment of 732.00 on the 10th of May, EMC receipted it on May 11, 2009. I then received a letter dated May 14th, 2009, stating that “…..we have not received your 03/15/09 forbearance payment(s) in the amount of 732.00…..”
I called to clear up matters and was met with such insolence from Ruben, Emp. ID: REU, that I sent a fax to his Supervisor: Erica Reeder via two different fax numbers: 1-949-399-1247 & 1297. I did not receive a reply from anyone.
By the following Saturday, a very bold notice of Sheriff Sale was taped to my front door.
I faxed copies of 12 consecutive receipts of payment, including May 10th 2009, to EMC Mortgage and their representing lawyers: Gregory Jarvardian, yet, I did not receive a reply from anyone. EMC also mailed a payment history for Account 0001651991, which also showed a receipt of payment on 05-12-09. Both items prove that I have not forfeited on my obligation to pay the agreed upon mortgage fee.
Since no one was listening or responding to my questions, proof of facts or giving me any other type of communication, I was forced to file for a Conciliation Conference. In the interim, I continued to pay the monthly mortgage fee.
And each month it was returned to me, which gave me the impression that EMC was trying to force a foreclosure.
At the first court appearance, the lawyers representing EMC seemed taken aback when I showed them the stack of payment receipts, proving that an obvious mistake had been made and that there had been no default of the forbearance agreement. But it turns out that the receipts have not canceled the foreclosure, they have only generated postponements of the foreclosure: 09/01/09, 10/06/09, 11/03/09, etc., until we came to February’s conclusion.
The conclusion being that EMC re-modified my original loan agreement to the following:
The Unpaid Principal Balance of your Loan will be adjusted as follows:
Current Unpaid Principal Balance $50, 739.81
Interest $ 7, 632.11
Escrow Advance 1 $ 443.15
Recoverable Balance, Foreclosure/Bankruptcy Costs (If applicable:) $ 8, 807.40
Adjusted Unpaid Principal Balance $67, 622.47
1 Funds that EMC has advanced on your behalf to pay taxes and/or Insurance premiums or other escrow Items.
2 These are servicing expenses and/or fees (such as NSF fees) that have been assessed to your account.
• The 'new principal and interest payment will be $367.14, plus escrow funds of $183.35, which equals a new total monthly payment amount of $550.49. Please note this amount is subject to change if there is an increase or decrease in your taxes or insurance premiums or other escrow items.
• Your new due date, upon returning this signed Agreement, will be March 1, 2010
(There is also an 'End of Mortgage' Balloon Payment of $14, 000.00)
The sale price for the house was 65, 000.00 when I bought it in 1992. My family and I have lived in this house for 17 years. Yet, this is the result of their re-modification of a 30yr minus 17yr mortgage. Missing from the calculations is the fact that EMC failed to note that they have not paid on the Taxes for the house in over a year. And if that wasn’t bad enough, weeks later they sent a notice stating that I have to pay the added amount of 209.06 for Escrow + amounts, making the monthly mortgage amount 763.19. For the last 3-4 years the mortgage amount was 732.00, with no missed payments. Prior to that, it had been 932.00 a month.
I need to mention that I am on SS-Disability: 1168.00 monthly.
It appears that they created this situation for the purpose of taking away my home and at this point they are doing their best to make it difficult for me to maintain my home.
Some of their actions seem very predatory and they are not following the guidelines of the “Obama Plan”.
Can your office provide me with some assistance in this matter?
Sincerely,
Ruth Michele Epperson