I think it’s about time for the general public to be openly critical about the practice of fluoridation - particularly its effect on infants and children.
- Is the science that has emerged over the last ten years showing evidence that fluoride is more toxic than lead, and in minute amounts, is it damaging to the brain of developing children, and reducing their IQ?
- Are silicofluorides (the industrial waste put into our water) 85 times more toxic than naturally-occurring calcium fluoride? Was the research to prove the safety and effectiveness of fluoride done using calcium fluoride and not silicofluorides?
- Is statistical evidence showing that it is contributing many diseases processes?
- Why are the dental costs higher in communities using fluoridation from increased prevalence of dental fluorosis?
- Why did the Environmental Protection Agency scientists conclude that the practice of fluoridation should not be used in the public water supply “as a vehicle for disseminating this toxic and prophylactically useless ... substance."
- Does the FDA state that fluoride it is a prescription drug? If this is the case, does silicofluoride meet the legal requirements of safety and effectiveness necessary for approval for an infant or child to ingest? Why does the American Dental Association supplement schedule advise that that fluoride prescription drugs should not be given to infants under 6 months of age? Is one cup of water per day for children age 6 months to 3 YEARS equivalent to the supplement controlled dose?
-Why has the majority of developed countries stopped, rejected or immediately banned fluoridation after researching its risk to the public?