His ex-wife has been using their daughters identity for the last 6 years and SD Social Services knew about it. The report that SD Child Protection knew that the 12 year old had a judgment against her from an unpaid utility bill. Illegal for the court to issue a judgment against a minor but happens and the sheriff knew it. Google southdakotagov info for photos of the sheriff's report to see the minor's credit report lists different social security numbers and birth date making the child older than her mother. The SD Court says that identity theft of your own children is legal. Also the mother has a 23 pages of judgments against her for unpaid loans and bills for the last 10 years. You don't have to pay your medical bills just let it go to judgment as the doctors can not turn anyone away. So why have health insurance? Honest people pick up the bill with higher insurance rates.
The States Attorney has a prior relation ship with the woman so he will not prosecute. SD Child Protection covers up identity theft of children while the State Courts go along with it. FBI, FTC and Social Security Administration all have copies and just ignore it. Why we pay taxes for government services that cover up identity theft and child abuse?? Identity theft resources center is no help but the mother is a textbook case of an identity theif.